Thanks. I’m building up a list of suggestions and will send them along.
Are you an Omni employee/contractor? You seem to know a lot about the development process. I would have suspected Omni has a lot of experience coding outlines and that this wouldn’t be such a big challenge.
I’m glad to hear you’re writing up your requests. They’re always receptive to feedback.
Not at all. I know about the process from being involved in the beta and having knowledge of how software is made.
They do, nearly two decades. While it is a challenge, it’s not insurmountable, given time. The outline isn’t just a plain system control (you’d be even more unhappy if it were) and requires a lot of manual drawing and animating.
This works for projects, tags, and perspective groups (due, defer). This pop up is not yet available for action groups. I am hopeful that action groups will be collapsible soon.
I do some dabbling with an internal Filemaker database for our office, I can understand and appreciate how hard some of the most mundane items in programming can be under-appreciated.
In other words, nothing is as simple as it seems. I’m not an Omni employee but I can understand the difficulties that comes with programming. So I think @nostodnayr has some appreciation for the difficulties behind the scenes.
Programming doesn’t include just writing some lines of code. If it were “easy”, all these companies would’ve nailed it on the first try.
A text editor looks easy. What’s so hard about creating a program that allows us to write text? The philosophies of the developer(s) plays into how the program functions. Drafts 5 is essentially a text editor. But man, it’s gotta a lot of power for a “simple” text editor.
I’m going to guess that collapsing action groups did not get higher priority like multiple tags, batch editing, new repeat, new notifications and did not make the cut for version 3.0.
It looks like a pretty good bet that it will appear in version 3.1. It’s not in the 3.0.4 TestFlight (yet). Crossing my fingers that it makes it in the 3.0.4 cut.
There are so many features just yelling for attention that it’s hard to know which ones are louder. The Mac TestFlight and the web site sounds like it’s getting the main focus right now.
You can always e-mail ofpreview@omnnigroup.com to upvote for this feature and tell the Omni Humans that this is an important feature to include sooner rather than later.
I´ve send an e-mail to Omnigroup one month ago. They reply saying that there are considering implementing this function, but most likely not this year (2020). It seems to me that this feature is definitely not a priority for them.
Really strange that this is not bothering them as it’s really the opposite of focus if all these subtasks clutter the perspective. Even Todoist fixed this now in a perfect way …
The answer I got directly from Ken Case in February was a lot more promising. He said that they were hoping to ship collapsible action groups for IOS in the next few months.
Yes, indeed Todoist has fixed this in the last updates. One feature that Things 3 and Todoist have that I would like to see on Omnifocus would be manual-sorting for perspectives. Right now, we got this only on Custom Perspectives that are group and sorted by Tags. It would be great if we could do manual-sorting on Flags, but, at least for me, this is not as important as collapsible action groups for IOS.
Unsurprisingly, there is no change to action groups on iOS, and I don’t believe anyone from Omni has said anything on the topic. Nested tasks remain a near-useless feature if your primary interface to OmniFocus is through your iOS devices.