I’m having trouble with my folder outline and i’d like to hear your thoughts. This may seem esoteric but bear with me. If you have many roles at work, or many clients (i.e. lawyers), then maybe you’ve thought about this.
I work in labour relations. I have grievance/arbitration files (projects) that pop up every month, around a half dozen per month, they take one or two months to resolve. Sometimes in settlement sometimes in litigation. The project is often a person, belonging to a client (the relevant Union). These projects require set tasks like: researching case law, writing the brief, presenting the brief, booking travel; interviewing witnesses; etc.
I also have contract negotations with Companies. These take longer (3-4 months) and pop up every few years. These involve negotiation prep, writing proposals, blocks of dates for having negotiations to prepare for, etc.
The remainder of my job is sort of advisory for all of my clients, lots of travel, admin work,
I’m suffering from what I would call an inside/out problem, which must be an old problem in the realm of file management. Put simply what goes at the top of the hierarchy and what goes inside - my roles, my type of projects, my clients or something else - when either starting point seems logical/rational?
For example: taking only part of my work, I could do the following file structure by client:
- Work
-Client One
—Arbitrations
——[Folder or Project] Case One
———[Project or Master Task] Research: Case One
———[Project or Master Task] Writing: Case One
——[Folder or Project] Case Two
—Negotiation
—Advisory
-Client Two
—Arbitrations
——[Folder or Project] Case One
———[Project or Master Task] Research: Case One
———[Project or Master Task] Writing: Case One
——[Folder or Project] Case Two
—Negotiation
—Advisory
-Meetings
-Admin
Or I could do by type of work (flipping inside out)
2. Work
—Arbitrations
——Client One
———Case One
————Research: Case One
————Writing: Case One
——Client Two
———Case Two
————Research: Case Two
————Writing: Case Two
—Negotiations
——Client One
——Client Two
—Advisory
——Client One
——Client Two
—Admin
Or - and this is new idea i might try- I could think of my job in terms of roles that I play
3. Work
—Advocate/Litigator
——Case One for Client One
———Project/Single Action: Complete Research for Case One (link to project in research)
———Project: Write Brief for Case One (project under “writer” folder)
———Project: Prepare for Hearing Case One
—Researcher
——Project: Research Case Law for Case One
——Project: Research contract language for Client One Negotiations
—Negotiator
——Client One Negotations
—Advisor
—Writer
——Write Brief for Client One Case One
—Employee (for admin tasks)
I hope you get the gist of my problem with folder/project structure: x inside y inside z or z inside y inside x? Either way it seems I repeat folders for either clients or responsibilities inside the master folder, which gets confusing.
On the one hand I’m over thinking, I know. But on the other, I just find a way to efficiently approach my list. Maybe Tags are the missing link here (i.e. tags for clients, or cases), but I feel like I already have too many tags.
If you have similar type of work, without clear lines, I’m interested in how you deal with the problem where a folder structure for AoF could be flipped inside our or outside in.
Thanks