I think @matgtd is looking for the modern equivalent of OLE embedding. I think the excellent python-pptx package is about to support that (based on conversations on its GitHub Issues page). But I wouldn’t count on it being released any time soon.
Personally, I export from OmniGraffle as a PNG file in as high resolution as I can stand and then import into PowerPoint. (I’m embedding using my own md2pptx open source program, which uses python-pptx. I wonder if this provides the automation @matgtd was hoping for.)
Based on the popup (right click on shape) from omnigraffle, it states copy “object style”. The shape that I placed in the canvas is an object. An object paste would be to paste those individuals objects into powerpoint. Right they paste together as a image.
Copying them individually is a non-starter.
copy and then assemble and then size etc… counter productive.
Ungroup your graphic, keeping in mind the “elements” that you want to access in PowerPoint.
In OG, use CopyAsPDF.
In PP, paste.
This still results in the same as the copy and paste. An Image that you can’t ungroup the elements.
OLE embedding is possible on the windows environment but not on the Mac since there is no native Visio. The problem I still think is that this couldn’t be animated individually. You would have to use the embedded interface. Ideally, I’d like the ability to copy and paste my omnigraffle flowchart into PP and able to ungroup it so that I can manipulate the image elements
@MartinPacker & @GraffleGuru, the question is how can I copy what I have created in oMni graffle and bring it into PP, select individual elements of the overall?
So you want each separate Shape; Line; etc to be (a) copied from OG in one act, and (b) pasted into PP, as a separate objects. That PP will have to understand as separate objects. That PP will then allow you to manipulate.
Perhaps we could go back to this:
Why do all that charting in a drawing tool, and then export it to a presentation tool, and then manipulate the drawn objects in the presentation tool ?
Why not present directly from the drawing tool that has the drawn objects, from where the manipulation is easy ?
Omnigraffle can build a flow chart faster, has stencils, shapes, magnets, text between lines and other things that makes it exponentially faster to use OG than PP. I can move elements with easy and rearranging things quickly.
It’s like saying why use a computer (OG) when you have a typewriter (PP for flowchart)?
I think we are losing sight of the question and talking theory/usability. Just looking for a solution for my objective since the user is the best advocate for their needs and desires. Since they have the full depth and scope of the task itself.
The question still remains is there in any way you could take a OG flowchart and move it into PP so you can manipulate the flowchart at it’s individual elements?
Perhaps you misunderstand me. I am trying to help you. I use OG heavily. I have hundreds of diagrams, including flowcharts and data models and network diagrams, that not only exist in a final form (eg. 1 page PDF), but also have to be presented (eg. in 10 progressive increments; eg. “move objects around”). I do not do that presentation in PP or Keynote, I do that presentation in OG.
If you are fixed on the way you do things, I cannot help.
If you are interested in other ways of doing things (but getting the same result on the big screen), please see if these ideas help you at all:
I draw the entire diagram with the final result in mind, on a single Canvas. I use Layers to separate the increments. Some objects are common, so they are placed on SharedLayers.
(Horrible compared to OG4, but hey, that is what we have.)
Then by turning selected Layers Off/On, I create a progression; a series of increments. (It is still a single Canvas.)
For each increment, export as PDF.
For the final intense single-page lecture note, turn On all layers, and export as PDF.
Example: here are the first 5 increments of 18 increments, as single PDFs, all created from a single diagram on a single Canvas.
Pretty much the same as , but don’t create the incremental PDFs, only the final PDF
Present the OG document.
Present increments simply by starting with all Layers turned off, and by turning Layers On for each increment.
Move elements around, as you explain things
For highlighting text or an object, I use a cursor, which is a rectangle with a 4pt blue Stroke, and a white 0% Fill.
Yes, this means that your OG doc is set up as a Template, it contains everything that you would put in the PP doc.
I don’t understand what you mean in your computer::typewriter analogy.
(The typewriter is definitely better for some tasks, and the computer definitely better for other tasks.)
I am saying, use the right tool for the job. If the presentation needs to be given in increments, or you need to “move separate objects around”, use OG. I am not suggesting that it is a great presentation tool, or that it is equivalent to PP/Keynote.
Sorry. The answer is no. And I do not see how it can be done within the current limits of OG and PP. Eg. there would be issues re lines joined to objects; shadows; etc. Ooo la la.
One of the reasons for using PowerPoint is the need to exchange with colleagues. (That’s my case, too: Getting colleagues to write in Markdown - my preferred tool - isn’t usually possible so I have to fit in with what they’re using. My guess is that’s the constraint here.)
I have the dubious luxury that I am a consultant, not really part of a team, even though I may head a customer team for the duration of a project. Even interim docs (ie. in the middle of a project, containing far less content than the final), which are subject to ongoing changes, are mine; mine; mine. As a matter of (a) a visible delivery, as well as (b) a matter of pride, I don’t want anyone writing on them.
The whole notion of a shared document sucks dead bears. I did not allow it in the old days (shared doc on an internal file server) and I definitely do not allow it nowadays (Google Docs; “internal” cloud file server; etc). Massive waste of time.
The document did not create itself, focussing on the doc is an error.
Focus on the author, who created the doc. Tell him the changes you want.
The cloud concept is broken, major corps are moving away from it, back to domestic servers. I never moved onto it, so there is nothing to reverse.
Even in a “shared doc” context, if you do not have the rule that one designated person owns the doc, you will have grief, that is avoidable.
Anyone and everyone can comment on my docs. Just mark up the PDF and send it back.
How ? Any way you want.
I receive docs made in Visio, that have my PDF imported, and then whatever the author wishes to comment; request-for-change; question; etc, on top of that.
one mathematician, who hates diagrams and loves text, sends me a text file with cryptic notes. He refers to my § headings (Legal numbering, pre-planned, absolutely necessary)
several just print the PDF and mark it up with a pen
not possible quite that way, if the “team” is not a team, but a bunch that is scattered … just scan the marked up page
I do export final diagrams to Visio, if the customer really wants it. But I do not export interim or incremental docs (described above) in Visio because the back-and-forth is very messy. Those who are stuck to Visio are free to use my PDFs as a base, and add content.
Our team (of consultants) is small - and a certain amount of co-authoring is part of the game. And we exchange with others occasionally. When we do we usually create PDFs - to avoid someone tampering with our message (which I know isn’t tamper proof). But sometimes we want them to embed in a larger thing - and possibly re-style. Then PowerPoint is the thing.
On the “one author, multiple editors” thing - that is when I sometimes get to insist it’s built in Markdown. The one downside is that Markdown can’t create every layout. (Part of the fun for me as the developer of md2pptx is inventing ways to express stuff with Markdown.)
If it is genuine one author, multiple editors, the best option, by a long shot, is Pages/Word. Full commentary plus corrections, waiting for the one author to approve/reject. Think PhD or Masters thesis, with lots of OG graphics, as it progresses over the period of a year.
For interim versions, we place the graphics on the left page, all the text pertaining to the graphic on the right page. Easy as.
For the final and ready-to-be-final versions, move the graphics and insert figure titles (for the Table of Contents to pick up). Easy as.
Another consideration I have to deal with is that I make process flow diagrams and database models and flowcharts in OmniGraffle when I can, but I work at a company that’s all Microsoft. Yes, I have Visio — which is why I use OG.
Sometimes I export to Visio. Last time I tried, the layers didn’t export correctly.
Sometimes I take screenshots or cut & paste objects into PPT.
I never investigated the idea of using AppleScript to convert my OG objects to Keynote slides then export to PPT. My intuition says there are things that won’t have a parallel … but maybe I’m too pessimistic.
Each release of OG introduces new bugs (things that worked now don’t work). Which is why I remain on OG 5.4.4. Then there is the loss of features, because the company does not believe in backward compatibility. I am not going to pay yet more money for the next version, to obtain a product that does less, and breaks more often, but has new features that I have managed without.
There are quite a few people who do. My commercial decision is, do not spend time and money on developing that route, because it further entrenches the use of OG. For the longer term, I have to look into getting a full replacement.